EN16931 / XRechnung / Peppol BIS 3 Validator

BR-CO-03: Value added tax point date (BT-7) and Value added tax point date code (BT-8)…

fatal CII UBL

What this error means and how to fix it

An EN 16931 calculation or consistency rule: an amount or condition does not match the other values in the invoice — most often the totals chain (line net amounts → total without VAT → VAT → total with VAT → amount due). This is an error: the invoice is rejected until it is fixed.

Check your invoice against BR-CO-03 — free

Runs the KoSIT validator 1.6.3, unmodified · result in seconds · the file is not stored · No file at hand? Try a sample invoice

This error needs information only you have, so it is not repaired automatically. The free check shows every finding in the file with its location; if other errors in the same file are in the automatic set (totals, VAT breakdown, rounding, element order), the result page offers the corrected file for 9 €.

Rule text

[BR-CO-03]-Value added tax point date (BT-7) and Value added tax point date code (BT-8) are mutually exclusive.
Where the rule is checked (XPath context and test)
SyntaxSeverityContext (XPath)Test (XPath)
EN16931-UBLfatal/ubl:Invoice | /cn:CreditNote(exists(cbc:TaxPointDate) and not(cac:InvoicePeriod/cbc:DescriptionCode)) or (not(cbc:TaxPointDate) and exists(cac:InvoicePeriod/cbc:DescriptionCode)) or (not(cbc:TaxPointDate) and not(cac:InvoicePeriod/cbc:DescriptionCode))
EN16931-CIIfatal//ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement/ram:ApplicableTradeTax((//ram:TaxPointDate) and not(//ram:DueDateTypeCode)) or (not (//ram:TaxPointDate) and (//ram:DueDateTypeCode)) or (not (//ram:TaxPointDate) and not (//ram:DueDateTypeCode))

Business terms referenced

BT-7, BT-8

Source: EN 16931-1 Schematron, UN/CEFACT CII syntax binding (ConnectingEurope/eInvoicing-EN16931, EUPL-1.2).

Source: EN 16931-1 Schematron, UBL syntax binding (ConnectingEurope/eInvoicing-EN16931, EUPL-1.2).

Check your invoice against this rule