EN16931 / XRechnung / Peppol BIS 3 Validator

PEPPOL-EN16931-R042: Allowance/charge percentage MUST be provided when allowance/charge base…

fatal CII UBL

What this error means and how to fix it

A Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 rule (OpenPeppol): an extra requirement for invoices sent over the Peppol network, for example electronic addresses (BT-34, BT-49), the business process (BT-23) or code values. This is an error: the invoice is rejected until it is fixed.

Check your invoice against PEPPOL-EN16931-R042 — free

Runs the KoSIT validator 1.6.3, unmodified · result in seconds · the file is not stored · No file at hand? Try a sample invoice

This error needs information only you have, so it is not repaired automatically. The free check shows every finding in the file with its location; if other errors in the same file are in the automatic set (totals, VAT breakdown, rounding, element order), the result page offers the corrected file for 9 €.

Rule text

[PEPPOL-EN16931-R042]-Allowance/charge percentage MUST be provided when allowance/charge base amount is provided.

XRechnung rule texts are published in German by KoSIT; the text above is the original.

Where the rule is checked (XPath context and test)
SyntaxSeverityContext (XPath)Test (XPath)
Peppol-UBLfatalubl-invoice:Invoice/cac:AllowanceCharge[not(cbc:MultiplierFactorNumeric) and cbc:BaseAmount] | ubl-invoice:Invoice/cac:InvoiceLine/cac:AllowanceCharge[not(cbc:MultiplierFactorNumeric) and cbc:BaseAmount] | ubl-creditnote:CreditNote/cac:AllowanceCharge[not(cbc:MultiplierFactorNumeric) and cbc:BaseAmount] | ubl-creditnote:CreditNote/cac:CreditNoteLine/cac:AllowanceCharge[not(cbc:MultiplierFactorNumeric) and cbc:BaseAmount]false()
XRechnung-UBLfatalfalse()
XRechnung-CIIfatalfalse()

Source: Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 Schematron, UBL (OpenPeppol, docs.peppol.eu validation artefacts 3.0.21).

Source: XRechnung Schematron, CII (itplr-kosit/xrechnung-schematron, Apache-2.0).

Source: XRechnung Schematron, UBL (itplr-kosit/xrechnung-schematron, Apache-2.0).

Check your invoice against this rule